Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02353
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1377
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Kim v. Newton Housing Authority et al
as 1:2015cv11487
Plaintiff: Oak-hee Kim
Defendant: Newton Housing Authority , Amy Sutherland , Tony Pugliese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COOKE v. BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv06798
Plaintiff: JUSTIN COOKE
Defendant: BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG, BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEANSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT STREET CRIMES UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01943
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2870
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05219
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Standard et al v. Madison et al
as 3:2014cv00754
Plaintiff: Tracy A. Standard, T. S. and L. S.
Defendant: Town of Madison, John Drumm, John Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORROW v. WEST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2013cv07536
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MORROW
Defendant: WEST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP, MARK G. PUGLIESE and BRIAN STUTZMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv07501
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?