Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-31034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-31034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Satchel et al v. Dayton Township et al
as 1:2016cv11518
Plaintiff:
James Satchel , Robert Adams and Rod Merten
Defendant:
Dayton, Township of , Robert Cook , Robert Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook, et al. v. City of Fairfield, et al.
as 2:2015cv02339
Plaintiff:
Billy Robert Cook , Michael John Maroulas and Becky Smisek-Gage
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Walt Tibbet, Rebecca Belk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Novin et al v. Fong et al
as 5:2014cv01218
Plaintiff:
Abdol Hossein Novin and Pooya Pournadi
Defendant:
Susan Fong, Robert Cook and Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jason Webb v. The City of Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv02029
Plaintiff:
Jason Webb
Defendant:
Scene Commander for City of Memphis Police Department, Major Kim Clark Mansel, Victory Towing and Recovery LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2010cv01518
Defendant:
Maggie Brown, City of Beaverton, Pacific Beach Tan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins et al v. Ostrowski
as 2:2010cv02095
Plaintiff:
Dustin Collins , Lawrence Moye , Debra Blanchard and others
Defendant:
Thomas Ostrowski
Petitioner:
Ernesto Perez and Deborah Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
