Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Allen v. Longview Police Department
as 3:2023cv05362
Plaintiff:
Romeo C Allen
Defendant:
Longview Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Cowlitz County District Court
as 3:2023cv05426
Plaintiff:
Romeo C Allen
Defendant:
Cowlitz County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Lewis County District Court
as 3:2023cv05424
Plaintiff:
Romeo C Allen
Defendant:
Lewis County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Federal Government
as 3:2023cv05425
Plaintiff:
Romeo C Allen
Defendant:
Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Cowlitz County District Court
as 3:2023cv05427
Plaintiff:
Romeo C Allen
Defendant:
Cowlitz County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv10530
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Jacobs
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Gomez-Alvarado v. Town of Westborough, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2023cv40008
Plaintiff:
Romeo Gomez-Alvarado
Defendant:
Town of Westborough, Massachusetts, William Kearney, Clifford Luce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Freeman v. Town of Irondequoit
as 23-112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrina Freeman
Defendant / Appellee:
Town of Irondequoit, Kimmie Romeo and John Perticone
Ciarametaro v. City of Gloucester, et al
as 22-1700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS J. CIARAMETARO
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOUCESTER, MA, CHARLES PAYSON, individually and as Gloucester's City Solicitor, JAMES DESTINO, as Gloucester's former Chief Administrative Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
