Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Davidson v. Barak et al
as 4:2016cv00819
Plaintiff:
Dewayne L Davidson
Defendant:
Obama Barak, Chuck Hagal, Tammy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH BEY v. UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE et al
as 7:2014cv01555
Petitioner:
TAMMIE SMITH BEY
Respondent:
UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE, S Lee Pake and William Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH BEY v. UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE et al
as 1:2014cv01219
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE SMITH BEY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE, S. LEE PAKE and WILLIAM KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Alabama Municipal Court of Northport Alabama v. Bey
as 7:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama Municipal Court of Northport Alabama
Defendant:
Tammie Smith Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gasswint et al v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv01800
Plaintiff:
William Gasswint and Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio , Shane Beckwith , Unknown Beckwith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Treesh v. Bobb-IH et al
as 2:2010cv00211
Plaintiff:
James H Treesh
Defendant:
Leha Bobb-IH, Sharon Branham, Lucie D McGreat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosky v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2009cv00400
Plaintiff:
John R. Crosky
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Timothy P Brunsman, Arville Duty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez et al v. Bear Stearns Co Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01816
Plaintiff:
Scott Rodriguez, Dejoy Modica, Nisha Modica and others
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Co Inc and EMC Mortgage Corp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
