Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Loos, Pam v. Reichert, Thomas et al
as 3:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
Pam Loos
Defendant:
Thomas Reichert , Theodre Ashbeck, Jr. , Micahel Malooly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. City of Delta, Colorado et al
as 1:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Terrie Johnson and Sosha Trujillo
Defendant:
City of Delta, Colorado , Robert (I) Thomas , Robert Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Johnson v. AGRI, et al
as 15-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Curtis Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, Secretary (USDA), Gary Cochran, Hendra Woodfork and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Prison Legal News v. Paul Babeu, et al
as 13-15965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL R. BABEU, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pinal County, Arizona, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, TONYA DELGADO, Sgt., in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01872
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
