Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 42
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff: Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant: HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Horst v. North Dakota et al
as 2:2021cv03414
Plaintiff: Charlotte Horst
Defendant: State of North Dakota, Doug Burgum and Job Service North Dakota Unemployment Insurance Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams Jr v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv03543
Defendant: State of Oregon, State of Missouri, State of South Carolina and others
Petitioner: Andy Hope Williams Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Benter v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant: Dan Heidbreder, Troy Kelly, State of North Dakota and others
Plaintiff: Dean Benter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benter v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2020cv00081
Defendant: Dan Heidbreder, Troy Kelly, State of North Dakota and others
Plaintiff: Dean Benter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Artem v. State of North Dakota, et al
as 18-35250
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE ARTEM
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, county of Morton, BISMARCK-MANDAN PUBLIC DEFENDER, JOSH PASTIR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05246
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Artem v. State of North Dakota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00798
Plaintiff: George Artem
Defendant: State of North Dakota and Bismarck-Mandan Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?