Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
DASTMALCHIAN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2015cv09072
Plaintiff: Shabnam Dastmalchian
Defendant: Department of Justice, Does 1-10, ANTHONY MOSELEY and others
Hurt v. US Marshals Service
as 15-1452
Plaintiff - Appellant: TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee: US MARSHALS SERVICE
Muckle v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al
as 15-1195
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAUL LAURENTON MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee: WELLS FARGO, PREMERE ASSET SERVICES, US BANK NA and others
Jacobs v. Hotchkiss et al
as 1:2014cv14747
Plaintiff: Lisa Jacobs
Defendant: Allison Hotchkiss, John Gibbons and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Austin v. US Marshal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00280
Plaintiff: Thomas Braden Austin
Defendant: US Marshal Service and Bob Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richeson v. Durkan et al
as 2:2013cv01576
Plaintiff: Peter R Richeson
Defendant: Jenny A Durkan and US Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Newell v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02018
Defendant: Jerome Combs Detention Center, Kankakee County Sheriff's Department, Timothy Bukowski and others
Plaintiff: Cecil Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELLERBE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2012cv06605
Plaintiff: DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, FBI HEADQUARTERS, POSTMASTER GENERAL (USPS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tom Arbino v. US Marshall Service, et al
as 12-4088
Plaintiff - Appellant: TOM ARBINO
Defendant - Appellee: US MARSHALL SERVICE and CINCINNATI POLICE DEPARTMENT
Arbino v. US Marshall Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00318
Plaintiff: Tom Arbino
Defendant: US Marshall Service and Cincinnati Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?