Cases 11 - 20 of 22,930
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints et al v. Rivera, Jr. et al
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints, Xavier T Sequints, S.S. and others
Defendant:
Miguel Rivera, Jr., Idaho State Police, Steven Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers et al v. Springfield Township et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Sanaa Chambers and Shannon Chambers
Defendant:
Springfield Township, Thomas Mullens, Derek Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hatter v. DART et al
as 1:2024cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daneka Hatter
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Supt. Cintron, Sgt. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DeLeon (PS) v. County of Adams, The et al
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joseph DeLeon, Sr.
Defendant:
County of Adams, The, Holguin and J. M. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYCELAND v. GUT
as 2:2024cv06863
Plaintiff:
MARTA BRYCELAND
Defendant:
THOMAS GUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Blanchard et al
as 4:2024cv03418
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Patrick Dean Blanchard, Charles Michael Dickens, James A. Segars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Jacobi Allen v. US
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C. JACOBI ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sewell v. Maddox et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Amy Giles Sewell
Defendant:
Thomas N Maddox, City of Elba, Alabama and Harold L. Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
