Cases 21 - 30 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disability Rights South Carolina et al v. McMaster et al
as 3:2021cv02728
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights South Carolina, Able South Carolina, Amanda McDougald Scott and others
Defendant:
Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson, State Superintendent Molly Spearman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv19026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Able et al v. Foxbrook Homeowners' Association, Inc et al
as 8:2021cv01913
Plaintiff:
Douglas Able and Christina Able
Defendant:
Foxbrook Homeowners' Association, Inc. and Dana Relyea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bishop v. Able et al
as 5:2021cv00766
Petitioner:
Denley Bishop
Respondent:
Shannon Bishop Able, Texas Department of Child Protection Services, Oklahoma Department of Child Protection Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Able v. Harden et al
as 5:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Renae Harden and Karen Tomblim
Plaintiff:
Clayton Able
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benson et al v. The Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2021cv00074
Defendant:
The Internal Revenue Service, IRS Agent Tommy Waldrop, IRS Agent Ifeoma Okeke and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Fletcher, Thomas Spears and Dennis Benson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
