Cases 21 - 30 of 52
ARCHEY v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv01521
Defendant:
JAY COSTA, JR., MONA N. GENERETT, CHARLES M. POWELL and others
Plaintiff:
MARY FRANCES ARCHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Zwick et al
as 2:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Amy M Zwick , Charles R. Black, Jr. , Monroe County Sheriff's Department and others
Counter_claimant:
Monroe County, Ohio , Monroe County Sheriff's Department , Charles R. Black, Jr. and others
Counter_defendant:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Ohio et al v. Grimes
as 3:2017cv02144
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and State of Walbridge
Defendant:
Eric A. Grimes, Perrysburg Municipal Court, Amy M. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Helms v. Withington et al
as 2:2016cv02388
Plaintiff:
Amy M Helms
Defendant:
Gabe Withington, John Jeffrey , Jessica Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Hummel v. Roebuck et al
as 5:2016cv00038
Defendant:
California State Deputy Attorney General, Janet Erb and Amy M Roebuck
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hummel
Thomas Janusz, Jr. v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-1330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS M. JANUSZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, ALAN LUCAS, PARRIS GEORGE and others
Shuper v. Sneirson, et al
as 15-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
AMY M. SNEIRSON, ANGELA TIZON, KAREN RUDZUEK and others
Shuper v. Sneirson, et al
as 15-1026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
AMY M. SNEIRSON, ANGELA TIZON, KAREN RUZUEK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
