Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Bloodworth et al v. Treadwell
as 1:2014cv01505
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamar Bloodworth and Dae Eek Cho
Defendant:
Marc Thomas Treadwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Guinn v. Jeffco Combined Courts, et al
as 13-1231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL GUINN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFCO COMBINED COURTS, JEFFCO JUDGE DAVITA, JEFFCO DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
BLOODWORTH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LAMAR BLOODWORTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BLOODWORTH v. ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00600
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE BLOODWORTH
Defendant:
ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guinn v. Jeffco Combined Courts, et al
as 1:2012cv01887
Plaintiff:
Bill Guinn
Defendant:
Jeffco Combined Courts, Jeffco Judge DaVita, Jeffco. District Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Campbell v. Mercer University et al
as 5:2012cv00181
Defendant:
MERCER UNIVERSITY, Mercer University Tarver Library, Mercer University Police and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
