Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Hincapie v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03432
Defendant:
Sergeant Timothy Connolly, Detective Robert Nardi, Sergeant Sharif Ali and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hincapie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPTARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv03765
Plaintiff:
CARLOS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT , JORGE HIDALGO , JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Falto-de Roman v. Municipal Gov't of Mayaguez, et al
as 17-1653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELBA I. FALTO-DE ROMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYAGUEZ, PR and JOSE GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ, as Mayor of the City of Mayaguez
Defendant:
ELENA MARTINEZ, as Member of the Boardo of the Head-Start Program in the City of Mayaguez, LUIS OLIVERAS, as Member of the Board of Director of the Head-Start Program in the City of Mayaguez, LUIS OJEDA, as Member of the Board of Director of the Head-Start Program in the City of Mayaguez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015at00401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores-Moret v. Gonzalez
as 3:2015cv01440
Plaintiff:
Tomas Flores-Moret
Defendant:
Carlos Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
