Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Philips v. Surrett et al
as 2:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Warren Philips
Defendant:
Donnie Surrett and Christopher Michael Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foote v. City of Blackfoot et al
as 4:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Foote
Defendant:
City of Blackfoot , Bingham County and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Litwinowicz v. City of Euclid et al
as 1:2014cv01608
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Litwinowicz
Defendant:
City of Euclid, Thomas K Malone, William R Cervenik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Litwinowicz v. City of Euclid et al
as 1:2014cv00552
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Litwinowicz
Defendant:
City of Euclid and Thomas K Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Block v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block
Defendant:
Snohomish County , The City of Gold Bar , Joe Beavers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEMPLIN et al v. MAIDENCREEK TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2013cv05514
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TEMPLIN , AMY TEMPLIN and C.T.
Defendant:
MAIDENCREEK TOWNSHIP , ONTELAUNEE TOWNSHIP , LEESPORT BOROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Mesa, City of , Jason Behnke , Richard Gogoiu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mettlen v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 5:2013cv04050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Mettlen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
