Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Office of the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00730
Plaintiff:
Enlace Comunitario, New Mexico Faith Coalition for Immigrant Justice, Office of the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Paul v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv01188
Plaintiff:
Jeff Paul
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Chad Wolf and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cerrato-Gonzalez v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00137
Defendant:
John 1-10 Does, William P. Barr and Chad Wolf
Plaintiff:
Osman Donald Cerrato-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pius Chi v. Martinez et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Respondent:
Robert Daum, Chad Wolf, Hugo R Martinez and others
Petitioner:
Munguh Pius Chi
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Woodward v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 4:2020cv00151
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection and Chad Wolf
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
