Cases 21 - 30 of 184
Diego Garcia v. Grain Valley High School Staff, et al
as 23-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Diego I. Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
Grain Valley High School Special Education Staff and Larynn Myers, High School Counselor
MELTON v. SEPTA, 5TH FLOOR-CLAIMS DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
CHARLES J MELTON
Defendant:
SEPTA, 5TH FLOOR-CLAIMS DEPARTMENT, SEPTA OFFICERS, SEPTA EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
C. F. v. Scolaro, et al
as 23-1220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. F., as a Parent and Next Friend to M.F.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY SCOLARO, individually and in her capacity as Director of Special Education for Marshfield Public Schools, ERIN WIGGIN, individually and in her capacity as Special Education Department Head for Marshfield High School, JEFFREY GRANATINO, individually and in his capacity as Superintendent of Marshfield Public Schools and others
Goossens v. State of California, Board of Behavioral Sciences et al
as 5:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Laura Goossens
Defendant:
State of California, Board of Behavioral Sciences, Pearson Education, Inc. doing business as Pearson Vue and National Board for Certified Counselors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Millia Promotional Services, et al v. State of Arizona, et al
as 23-15180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILLIA PROMOTIONAL SERVICES, an Arizona nonprofit corporation and KHAMILLIA HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, acting through Arizona Department of Economic Security, Division of Employment and Rehabilitation Services, KRISTEN MACKEY, individually and in her official capacity as Arizona Department of Economic Security, Division of Employment and Rehabilitation Services Rehabilitation Services Interim Administrator, TRACI ZWEIG-PRZECIOSKI, individually and in her official capacity as Arizona Department of Economic Security, Contract Monitoring Liaison and others
Foote, et al v. Ludlow School Committee, et al
as 23-1069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN FOOTE, MARISSA SILVESTRI, STEPHEN FOOTE, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN FELICIANO and SANDRA SALMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
LUDLOW SCHOOL COMMITTEE, TODD GAZDA, former Superintendent, LISA NEMETH, interim Superintendent and others
Interested Party:
GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS, MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENTS and FAMILY INSTITUTE OF CONNECTICUT
Chiles v. Salazar, et al
as 23-1002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KALEY CHILES
Defendant / Appellant:
PATTY SALAZAR, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Department of Regulatory Agencies, REINA SBARBARO-GORDON, in her official capacity as Program Director of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and the State Board of Addiction Counselor Examiners, JENNIFER LUTTMAN, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Yates, et al
as 22-3672
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, Blair, Camp Unit Manager, Randle and others
Chiles v. Salazar, et al
as 22-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KALEY CHILES
Defendant / Appellee:
PATTY SALAZAR, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Department of Regulatory Agencies, REINA SBARBARO-GORDON, in her official capacity as Program Director of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and the State Board of Addiction Counselor Examiners, JENNIFER LUTTMAN, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and others
King Alvarez v. HUD, et al
as 22-3282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING ANTHONY ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a HUD, MARCIA FUDGE, Secretary of HUD, NADAB BYNUM, Director of Community Planning and Development at HUD Philadelphia Regional Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
