Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Hobbs v. Doe Run Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Lawrence H. Hobbs
Defendant:
Doe Run Corporation, United States of America, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GIANNINO v. HAALAND
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Mr Anthony GIANNINO and ANTHONY GIANNINO
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Coomes v. Haaland et al
as 5:2021cv05094
Plaintiff:
Moira Coomes
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Darryl LaCounte, Timothy LaPointe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Browne v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Edwards Browne and Edward Browne
Defendant:
The Honorable Merrick Garland, United States Department of Interior and The Honorable Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UTE Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Spencer Cox, United States Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff:
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
