Cases 21 - 30 of 3,033
Tillotson (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Chris Tillotson
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carl Ledford v. Meloday Waldo, et al
as 24-1905
Plaintiff:
CARL L. LEDFORD
Defendant:
MELODAY WALDO, FORT WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LAPORTE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2024cv03751
Plaintiff:
Unknown Plaintiff
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Other:
Alexandra Greenblatt
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 24-1776
Plaintiff:
Reggie D. Huff
Defendant:
Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
Robert Cason v. Middlesex County Prosecutors Office, et al
as 24-1969
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. CASON
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, OLD BRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER G. BRACHT and others
Davis v. Stidham et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Lance Davis
Defendant:
Brett Stidham, Alejandra Najera, Frankie Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ledford v. Waldo et al
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Meloday Waldo, LaPorte County Sheriff's Office, LaPorte County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pratt v. Town of Rockland et al
as 1:2024cv11360
Plaintiff:
Harvey Pratt
Defendant:
Town of Rockland, Town of Hillsborough, New Hampshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Michael Rogel v. Bozeman Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Rogel
Defendant:
Bozeman City Police Department, Justin Chaffins, Zachary Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Walde v. Sharon Keri, et al
as 24-11631
Plaintiff:
PAUL DONOVAN WALDE
Defendant:
SHARON KERI, Process Manager, JOHN DOE, UNNAMED DEFENDANT PERSON OF DMV OVER SEE LICENSE SUSPENSION and UNKNOWN PERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
