Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Nevada Jerome v. Murphy et al
as 2:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
Estate of Nevada Jerome
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, MD and Dorrie Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aristea Hupp, et al v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Assoc, et al
as 16-56245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARISTEA HUPP and PAUL HUPP
Defendant - Appellee:
SOLERA OAK VALLEY GREENS ASSOCIATION, KEYSTONE PACIFIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., DENNIS RICE and others
Republic Water Company of Texas, LLC and Fort Stockton Holdings, LLC
as 4:2016cv00033
Defendant:
Weldon Blackwelder, Vanessa Cardwell, Ronald Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Fort Stockton Holdings, LP and Republic Water Company of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Aristea Hupp et al v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Association et al
as 5:2016cv00370
Defendant:
Kathy J Axberg, Richard Crowe, Arthur Kenneth Cunnigham and others
Plaintiff:
Aristea Hupp and Paul Hupp
Lampley et al v. Franklin County, Illinois et al
as 3:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael C Lampley and Terri L Lampley
Defendant:
Franklin County, Illinois, Donald Jones, Chet Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
