Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Tristan Florendo-Ong v. IL-USA, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tristan Florendo-Ong
Defendant / Appellee:
IL-USA, Illinois-United States & Company, 116th/117th US Congressional 535 Members, 535 Members Bicameral Legislature, 177 Members IL G.A., 177 Members Bicameral Legislature and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Johnson v. Hospital Housekeeping Systems (HHS) et al
as 6:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Hospital Housekeeping Systems (HHS), Palestine Regional Medical Center, Regina Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sabet v. FSMB et al
as 1:2022cv03369
Plaintiff:
Samuel Arthur Sabet
Defendant:
FSMB, FDA, HHS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
AFZAL et al v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINER NJBME et al
as 2:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
MD FIAZ AFZAL and DR. SHAHIDA SHUJA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINER NJBME, LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS LSBME and HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES OFFICER OF INSPECTOR GENERAL HHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
