Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 133
v. Leask et al
as 4:2022cv02480
Defendant: Ewan Leask, City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Leask v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 4:2022cv02481
Plaintiff: Ewan Leask
Defendant: City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Watson v. Hennepin County et al
as 0:2022cv02266
Plaintiff: Anthony Michael Watson
Defendant: Hennepin County, Nick Peterson and J. Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2412
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2283
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00974
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Totten v. Osberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05360
Plaintiff: Mrs. Jane Totten and Jane Totten
Defendant: Michael Osberg, John R. Batiste, J. Doe Supervisors 1 - 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burden v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff: Aaron Burden
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO, Albert Torres, Mohammed Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melendez et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2021cv03769
Plaintiff: Bernard Melendez, Jennifer Robinson, M Roe and others
Defendant: MD J Doe, South Carolina Department of Social Services, Shakeitha Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Luellen v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv05626
Plaintiff: Kimberly Luellen
Defendant: City of Chicago, Officer David, Officer Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?