Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Jones v. Hickman et al
as 5:2012cv02326
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Hickman, Police Dept City of Leesville, James Parrott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hickman et al
as 2:2012cv02326
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Hickman, Police Dept City of Leesville, James Parrott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pines v. Bailey
as 12-3352
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James Pines
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Bailey, Ind
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Orlando Bethel, et al v. Middletown City School Dist., et al
as 11-3652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO BETHEL and GLYNIS BETHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOHN KASICH, Governor, In his individual and official capacity, GREG RASMUSSEN, Middletown City School District Superintendent, In his individual and official capacity and others
Bethel et al v. Middletown City School District
as 1:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Middletown City School District , John Kasich, Greg Rasmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pines v. Bailey
as 3:2010cv00866
Plaintiff:
James Pines
Defendant:
Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Spencer v. United States Office of Personnel Management et al
as 2:2010cv03619
Defendant:
Michael Bailey, Todd Cornett, Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Spencer
Doll et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Doll, Sr. and Kenneth Doll, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry D. Williams and Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bailey v. Officer, Belcher, et al
as 3:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Defendant:
Belcher, Davis and Gene Kelley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
