Cases 21 - 30 of 389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mao Cardenas et al v. County of Ventura, et al
as 2:2023cv05482
Plaintiff:
Mao Cardenas and Estate of Tomoko Hoetzlein
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VENTURA,, Sevet Johnson, CITY OF CAMARILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogers v. Hernandez
as 2:2023cv00571
Defendant:
Peter Gene Hernandez and Bruno Mars
Plaintiff:
Angelina M Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ryan Randall v. Bally's Casino, et al
as 23-15461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN KENNETH RANDALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BALLY'S CASINO, CEO and Casino Security, VALERIE SENATRA, TROY TUKE, Bishop and others
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Ray Mar Enterprises et al
as 8:2022cv02220
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Defendant:
Ray Mar Enterprises and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3338
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
