Cases 21 - 30 of 184
Michael Smith v. USA
as 23-55030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SMITH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2022cv05092
Plaintiff:
MATTHIAS WAGMAN, MACKENZIE SMITH, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tate Prows and Tate David Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Smith v. Center for Disabilities
as 1:2022cv02609
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Center for Disabilities doing business as Center Towards Self-Reliance
Brown v. Monroy et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Evan Brown
Defendant:
Adrienne Monroy, Michael Smith, Arthur Etnoyer, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. United States
as 3:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Clervrain et al v. Gruters et al
as 3:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Roode A. Clervrain, Francis Osei-Fosu and others
Defendant:
Joe Gruters, Mike Arnold, Mike Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
