Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Lockridge v. Amherst Police Dept. et al
as 1:2011cv00402
Plaintiff:
Vern Ramon Lockridge
Defendant:
Amherst Police Dept. and Robert Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiroz v. Hall
as 1:2011cv02072
Plaintiff:
Jose Quiroz
Defendant:
Federal Agent Robert Hall , Lana Sabata, Jessica Salley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamm v. Spalding County, Georgia et al
as 3:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hamm
Defendant:
Spalding County, Georgia , James Dee Stewart , Robert Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hall v. Barnes et al
as 4:2010cv04015
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Robert Hall
Defendant:
Harry F. Barnes, Barry Bryant and Wendy L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Stroud
as 4:2010cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Robert Hall
Defendant:
John F Stroud, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarez et al v. Hidalgo County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lupe Florez Alvarez, Lupe Florez Alvarez, Lupe Florez Alvarez and others
Defendant:
Hidalgo County Board of Commissioners, Robert Hall, Dolly Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Board of County Commissioners of Hidalgo County et al
as 6:2009cv00805
Plaintiff:
William Young
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Hidalgo County, Robert Hall and David A Arredondo
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lackey v. Clarkedale Arkansas, City Of et al
as 3:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Lackey
Defendant:
Clarkedale Arkansas, City Of, Sam Stuckey, Robert Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
