Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Stuke v. Grostyan
as 0:2012cv02099
Plaintiff:
Richard James Stuke
Defendant:
Coley J. Grostyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Clay County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2012cv04028
Plaintiff:
Pamela Curtis
Defendant:
Clay County Board of Commissioners and Richard James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kabbaj et al v. Obama
as 1:2011cv23492
Plaintiff:
Younes Kabbaj and Omar Abdel Rahman
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, George W. Bush, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Richard James Stuke v. Jeffrey A. Ehrich, et al
as 11-2644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard James Stuke
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeffrey A. Ehrich, Leonard, Street and Deinard Attorney, Joel E. Abrahamson, Leonard, Street and Deinard Attorney and Union Gospel Mission, The "Mission"
Stuke v. Leonard, Street and Deinard et al
as 0:2011cv00141
Plaintiff:
Richard James Stuke
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Ehrich , Joel E. Abrahamson and Union Gospel Mission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kessler v. Daniel et al
as 1:2010cv03114
Defendant:
David Daniel, City of Grants Pass and Michael Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Richard James Kessler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Berger
as 3:2010cv00921
Plaintiff:
Richard James Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Wendy W. Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Ohio et al v. Northfield Center Board of Trustees et al
as 5:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and Richard James
Defendant:
Northfield Center Board of Trustees , Richard H. Reville , Paul G. Buescher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
