Cases 21 - 26 of 26
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS et al v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, MARTINSVILLE CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, AVON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS and others
Defendant:
TAMMY MEYER, TODD ROKITA and KATIE JENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defense Distributed v. U.S. Dept. of State
as 15-50759
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENN SMITH, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Senior Advisor, Office of Defense Trade Controls, KENNETH B. HANDELMAN, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, SARAH J. HEIDEMA, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Division Chief, Regulatory and Multilateral Affairs, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy and others
Amicus Curiae:
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE KING, TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION, REPRESENTATIVE BRIAN BABIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED and DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Sherry Katz-Crank v. Kimberly Haskett, et al
as 15-1809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRY KATZ-CRANK, a Michigan resident
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY HASKETT, individually and in her official capacity as an investigator for the Indiana Secretary of State, THOMAS TRATHEN, individually and as Chief Investigator for Marion County, Indiana, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and others
KATZ-CRANK v. HASKETT et al
as 1:2013cv00159
Defendant:
CARL BRIZZI, BARBARA CRAWFORD, KIMBERLY HASKETT and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY KATZ-CRANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katz-Crank v. Haskett et al
as 1:2012cv01335
Plaintiff:
Sherry Katz-Crank
Defendant:
Kimberly Haskett, Charlie Williams, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2008cv01484
Plaintiff:
DRAMETRA BROWN
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA, TODD ROKITA, J. BRADLEY KING and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
