Cases 31 - 40 of 17,298
Smith v. America et al
as 6:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer D. America and Orange County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfaro v. Utah County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Samantha Alfaro
Defendant:
Utah County Sheriff's Office, Mike Smith and Chandler Cattelain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantrell v. Brunswick Maine Police, et al
as 24-1522
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, BRUNSWICK, ME, SCOTT STEWART and others
Lynch v. Thompson-Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
Essence Thompson-Smith, Rabee Ratarseh, WoodForest National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherwood v. Rollins et al
as 7:2024cv03257
Plaintiff:
Kim Marie Sherwood
Defendant:
Mark Rollins, Mark S Smith and Spartanburg County School District One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Adaeze Nwosu v. Karla Smith
as 24-1486
Plaintiff:
ADAEZE NWOSU
Defendant:
KARLA SMITH, KEVIN HESSLER, MICHAEL MCAULIFFE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Madelene Smith v. Ed Jeffords, et al
as 24-11788
Plaintiff:
MADELENE SMITH
Defendant:
ED JEFFORDS, RICHARD JOHNSON, DONNIE RAY and others
Smith v. Brazzle et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Andre Charles Brazzle, Andre Charles Brazzle of Brazzle Constable Service and County of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
