Cases 31 - 40 of 214
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nelson v. County of Kenosha et al
as 2:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Kari Nelson
Defendant:
Kenosha County, David Beth, Ltd Daniel Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. City of Fargo et al
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dione Rainey
Defendant:
City of Fargo, Fargo Police Department, Det. Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes and Salinda Eve Hayes
Defendant:
Scott Owen, Jon Copeland, Michael Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooperrider et al v. Blevins et al
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cooperrider, Cooperrider for Senate Campaign and Richard Hayhoe
Defendant:
Don Blevins, Jr., Kathy Witt and Rodrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coker et al v. Warren et al
as 3:2022cv00518
Defendant:
Northeast Florida Newspaper, LLC, Slyvester Warren, III, Justice and Equality Coalition, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Befaithful Coker, V. C. and M. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coker et al v. Warren et al
as 6:2022cv00854
Defendant:
Northeast Florida Newspaper, LLC, Slyvester Warren, III, Justice and Equality Coalition, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Befaithful Coker, V. C. and M. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Witt
as 3:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Alex Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
