Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ashley et al v. Flint, City of, et al
as 4:2011cv12588
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ashley , Jo Ellen Bailey , Carolyn Barhite and others
Defendant:
Flint, City of , Donna Poplar and Robert Erlenbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Simon v. Danny Bickell, et al
as 10-5313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Simon
Defendant - Appellee:
Danny Bickell, Wynne Patrick Kelly, Assistant United States Attorney, Federal Prison Industries Inc. and others
SERRANO et al v. SHOOT et al
as 1:2010cv00705
Defendant:
CAROLYN BICKEL, R.N., ROBERT S. CRAIG, Psych, C. HERBERT HENRY, PH.D and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA SERRANO and DIANA SERRANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ivy L. Beverly v. Mark Bivens et al
as 2:2010cv04061
Plaintiff:
Ivy L. Beverly
Defendant:
Stephen Bickel, Stephen Bickel, Mark Bivens and others
Bickel v. SUNY Upstate Medical University
as 3:2010cv00201
Plaintiff:
Brady Bickel
Defendant:
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SIMON vs. BICKELL et al
as 1:2009cv01983
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant:
DANNY BICKELL, JEFF ATKINS, WYNNE P. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Simon v. Jane Doe and John Doe et al
as 1:2009cv04541
Plaintiff:
Charles Simon
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe, Danny Bickell, Jeff Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Simon v. Bickell et al
as 1:2009cv04350
Plaintiff:
Charles Simon
Defendant:
Danny Bickell, Jeff Atkins, Wynne P. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
