Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Kelly v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00975
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelly v. Eckert et al
as 3:2011cv00949
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pollock v. Lavender, Jr. et al
as 2:2011cv00114
Plaintiff:
Randy Pollock
Defendant:
George Lavender, Jr., Chris Davis, Derrick Uhrig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Cogan et al
as 3:2010cv00533
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin D. Cogan, Edwynn Burckle, George E. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Briggs v. Blake et al
as 8:2009cv02417
Plaintiff:
Andrea G. Briggs
Defendant:
Catherine Blake, William D. Quarles, Jr., J. Motz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv06303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0829 (Repealed) Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Gordy v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2008cv04414
Plaintiff:
June P. Gordy
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, John Harrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lown et al v. The Salvation Army
as 1:2004cv01562
Plaintiff:
Estela Nunez, All Plaintiffs, Shantee Gordon and others
Defendant:
Antonia C. Novello, John B. Mattingly, Police Officer DeMarzo and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
All Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
