Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collings v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00655
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Mitchell Scott Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RZONCA v. BOROUGH OF PARKESBURG, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv01791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. RZONCA
Defendant:
JOHN P. COLDIRON, WENDY KEEGAN, JOHN P. HAGAN, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Marshall County Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00519
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Marshall County Alabama, Timothy Allen Jolley and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARNES V. SPENCER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ET AL
as 3:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
SPENCER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SPENCER COUNTY, INDIANA, Joshua Carnes and others
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHAEL PHILLIPS and TOWN OF ROCKPORT, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020at00999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
R.S. et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2020cv01170
Plaintiff:
R. S. and Jorge Vicente
Defendant:
Dustin Willey, Colton Hughes, Morin Yom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
S. et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 2:2020at00821
Plaintiff:
R. S. and Jorge Vicente
Defendant:
Dustin Willey, Colton Hughes, Morin Yom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
