Cases 31 - 40 of 132
DOE-GC v. City of Waller et al
as 4:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE-GC and Gracie Cates
Defendant:
City of Waller, Waller County, John Michael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Hall et al
as 5:2021cv00662
Plaintiff:
John Bernard Williams, III
Defendant:
Hon. David C. Hall and Hon. Janis Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santana v. Naugatuck et al
as 3:2020cv00752
Plaintiff:
William A. Santana and William Santana
Defendant:
John T. Williams and Borough of Naugatuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dallas Police Department
as 3:2020cv00693
Plaintiff:
John E Williams
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Williams et al v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott and Associates LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Chase v. Williams et al
as 3:2019cv03012
Defendant:
John B Williams, III and JBW Enterprises
Plaintiff:
Pearline Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. King et al
as 1:2019cv04856
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Janet King, Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield, III and Magistrate Judge Gerrilyn G. Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2019cv00067
Defendant:
William M Locke, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
