Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 82
McGill v. Mandrusiak et al
as 1:2019cv01985
Defendant: Rachel M. Mandrusiak, Jane/John Doe (4), Jane/John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff: Roy McGill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohm v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2019cv00541
Defendant: City and County of Honolulu, P M Autoworks Inc., Jane/John Does 1-29 and others
Plaintiff: Jianna Bohm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Macklin v. Shelby County,Tennessee et al
as 2:2018cv02873
Defendant: Jane/John Does 1-10, Vernita Wells, LPN, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Joe Nathan Macklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00523
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03515
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUTLER v. CASE et al
as 2:2018cv01026
Plaintiff: ADAM BUTLER
Defendant: ANTHONY CASE , STEVENSON , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON et al v. MOORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00785
Plaintiff: VICTOR JACKSON and ANTHONY JACKSON
Defendant: BRANDON MOORE , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JANE/JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washpon v. Jane/John Does 1 et al
as 6:2018cv00051
Defendant: Bexar County Sheriff Department, Brazos County Sheriff Department, City of Austin, TX and others
Plaintiff: Kathleen Julie Washpon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TINSLEY v. SCHUCK et al
as 2:2017cv05190
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS TINSLEY
Defendant: JAMES F. SCHUCK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JANE/JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv05189
Plaintiff: THEO SMITH
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?