Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Hubbard v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2011cv00073
Defendant:
Whitley County, Kentucky , Kenneth Mobley , Robert O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv09130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00839
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Mary Ann Blackman, et al v. DC, et al
as 10-7019
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mary Ann Blackman, MIKEISHA BLACKMAN, by her mother & friend, Paul Chassy, DR., DARYL BUCKNER, by his next friend & Court appointed educational advocate, SHAWN RECTOR, by his next friend and educational advocate, Carolyn Jones, JAMES JONES, by his mother & friend and others
Petitioner - Appellee:
Wayne Young
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation and District of Columbia Public Schools
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-7800
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roach et al v. Marrow et al
as 3:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Roach, Deneen Roach, Matthew Roach and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Marrow, John Adams, Jr., Cathy A. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Marrow v. Amato et al
as 3:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Marrow
Defendant:
Jason Amato and James Borrico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roach v. Marrow
as 4:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Roach
Defendant:
Kenneth Marrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
