Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04620
Defendant:
Sergeant Boris Blackmon, City of New York, Police Officer Jack Kwok and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Burnley v. Bryan Norwood
as 11-1729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN T. NORWOOD, Colonel (pty), Chief of Police for the City of Richmond, JOHN VENUTI, Chief of Police - Virginia Commonwealth University, HOWARD J. HICKS, Captain and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Terry v. County of Suffolk, in the State of New York et al
as 2:2011cv02247
Defendant:
Laura Ahearns, Rose Marie Berger, County of Suffolk, in the State of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Henry R. Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miller v. Zaruba et al
as 1:2010cv06533
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Miller
Defendant:
John E. Zaruba, Unknown DuPage County Deputy Sheriffs, Ushman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Petersen et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2010cv02042
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Petersen and James P. Evanhoe
Defendant:
Warren Miller, Andy Pearson, Michael A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00172
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rhodes v. County of Calaveras et al.
as 1:2008cv01705
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Rhodes
Defendant:
County of Calaveras, Dave Sanders, Thomas Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Seekford v. Miller et al
as 5:2008cv00052
Plaintiff:
Wade Allen Seekford
Defendant:
Michael D. Miller and Ricky L. Hassler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
