Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Watkins v. Armed Forces of the United States Government et al
as 1:2012cv04639
Plaintiff:
Tony Dugal Watkins
Defendant:
Armed Forces of the United States Government, Army EUSA Camp, John H. Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Cayton et al
as 4:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Hampton, Sr., J.H. and S.H.
Defendant:
Darrell Cayton, Michael Paul, S.C. Hardison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Van Meter v. Withers et al
as 3:2011cv00333
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
James Withers, Jack Porter, Jeanette Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Meter v. Reteke et al
as 3:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
Clair Reteke, Mark Sevier, Sally Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN METER v. RETEKE et al
as 1:2011cv00848
All Are Sued In Their Individual And Official Capacitie:
CHARLES A. PENFOLD
Defendant:
CLAIR RETEKE, MARK SEVIER and SALLY STEVENSON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL VAN METER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Meter v. Indiana State of
as 4:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Monson et al
as 5:2011cv00841
Plaintiff:
Helen WSS Coleman
Defendant:
Thomas S Monson, Michael Paul Eagar, Adrian C Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. HOTT et al
as 2:2009cv02644
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL MCDANIEL
Defendant:
HOTT, HEHAN, ROKEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Thomaslinson et al
as 3:2008cv01194
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Wright
Defendant:
Detective Thomaslinson, Agent Deadeye, Sid Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
