Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv15265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Andrew Daniels v. National City Bank
as 08-4607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL CITY BANK
Daniels v. National City Bank
as 1:2008cv02195
Plaintiff:
Andrew Daniels
Defendant:
National City Bank
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hood v. Baker Hughes Tool Company, Incorporated et al
as 1:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
William Lee Hood
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Tool Company, Incorporated, U.S. Banks, National City Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith et al v. United States Of America
as 1:2008cv00408
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Y. Smith, Amy K. Smith, Denise Hill and others
Defendant:
United States Of America, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JAT, Incorporated, et al v. National City Bank of the Midw, et al
as 08-1848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAT, INCORPORATED, PLEASANT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH, BODY OF CHRIST CHRISTIAN CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
NEW GALILEE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH and PHILLIP PEAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF THE MIDWEST and NATIONAL CITY CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv14442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
TAYLOR et al v. NATIONAL CITY BANK et al
as 1:2007cv01148
Plaintiff:
ERIC TAYLOR and GAIL TAYLOR
Defendant:
NATIONAL CITY BANK, SAMUEL L. JACOBS, WILLIAM W. HURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
