Cases 31 - 40 of 1,083
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
S & S Homes, LLC et al v. City of Peru, Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
S & S Homes, LLC, Zachary See and Michael Selleck
Defendant:
City of Peru, Indiana, City of Peru Building Department, Ronald Dausch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cesar v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
SON v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv05177
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SON
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, DELAWARE COUNTY INTERMEDIATE UNIT, DELAWARE COUNTY INTERMEDIATE UNIT ASTON EDUCATION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
S. ROTONDI & SONS, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2023cv23161
Plaintiff:
S. ROTONDI & SONS, INC.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, BRITTON INDUSTRIES, INC. and JAMES BRITTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In Re: Christian Son
as 1:2023pf00004
In Re:
Christian Son
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
