Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Bordages v. United States Justice Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Justice Dept., United States Dept. of Homeland Security, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skelton v. United States Navy et al
as 3:2015cv04169
Plaintiff:
James B Skelton
Defendant:
United States Navy, Navy Sea Systems Command and Navy Judge Advocate General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asha Lane Gibson v. NSA
as 15-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHA LANE GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, FBI and others
Thomas v. United States Navy et al
as 5:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Navy, McCracken County, Kentucky, Guardianship Offices of Ken Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heap et al v. Hagel et al
as 1:2014cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jason Daniel Heap and The Humanist Society
Defendant:
Charles T. Hagel , Raymond E. Mabus, Jr. , William F. Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julianne Panagacos, et al v. John Towery, et al
as 14-35598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIANNE PANAGACOS, JEFFREY BERRYHILL, ANDREA ROBBINS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J TOWERY, THOMAS R RUDD, CITY OF OLYMPIA and others
Muhammad v. United States Navy Recruiter
as 14-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Navy Recruiter, Main Post Office and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
