Cases 41 - 50 of 5,447
C. Finley v. Karen Bass et al
as 2:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
C. Finley
Defendant:
Karen Bass, Eunisses Hernandez, Paul Krekorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez Izaguirre v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 8:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Bryan Rafael Rodriguez Izaguirre
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rodriguez v. Gordon et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Timothy S Rodriguez
Defendant:
Aaron Gordon and Howard County Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garcia v. Patterson et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Garcia
Defendant:
Jeff Patterson, Jessie Rodriguez and City of Carlsbad NM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
