Cases 41 - 50 of 320
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI ANN ZARLENGA, VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent and LORI A. ZARLENGA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Tahmalwash v. Lewis et al
as 1:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Jayson Tahmalwash
Defendant:
Chairman Gerald Lewis, George Meninick, Sr, Secretary Charlene Tillequots and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jamal Parker v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 23-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor Beneficiary a a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propria Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior et al, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Attorney General et al, ANDREW SAUL, d/b/a Commissioner et al and others
Friedrich Lu v. Julio Castillo, et al
as 23-5011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant / Appellee:
Julio A. Castillo, Clerk, Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge, Roslynn R. Mauskopf, Director and others
Kenneth Brown, et al v. John Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN, Moor Beneficiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST, A Private Moor Aboriginal Virginian National Subject Ambassador At Large and Noble of the Al Moroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN, d/b/a Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, d/b/a Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, et al United States Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Merrick Gardland, et al. Attorney General, et al, United States Heirs and Assignees and others
Debtor / Appellee:
RALPH BREEDEN, III, d/b/a Ralph Breeden III et al d/b/a GA Bar No 195892 attorney at law Hayt, Hayt & Landau, P.L. Heirs and Assignees
Ronnie Todd v. Ryan Todd, et al
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Ryan Ramael Todd, CHRISTINE RIDLEY, Estate, Beneficiary Christine Ridley, ROONEY TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Rooney Todd and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEROME BLACKWELL, Estate, Beneficiary, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, MARK BRNOVICH, Arizona Attorney General and others
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magistrelli v. Former US Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Defendant:
Former US Attorney, Former United States of America President, Illinois Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff:
Karol Dawn Magistrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN D/B/A ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE, JANET LOUISE YELLEN d/b/a JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, MERRICK GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
