Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Marshall et al v. Burnley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv01090
Plaintiff: Krystal M. Marshall and Milton J. Davison
Defendant: Benjamin Burnley, Jason Rauch, Keith Wallen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hendrix et al v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2017cv02039
Defendant: Armor Correction Health Services of New York, Inc., Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. Employees and Agents and others
Plaintiff: Shelly Lawrence Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Planned Parenthood of Grt TX, et al v. Charles Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-50282
Plaintiff - Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING AND PREVENTATIVE HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SAN ANTONIO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CAMERON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant: STUART W. BOWEN, JR., Inspector General of HHSC, in his official capacity and CHARLES SMITH, Executive Commissioner of HHSC
Leppert v. The County of Suffolk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv03723
Defendant: John & Jane Does 1-10, John & Jane Does 11-20, Timothy D. Sini and others
Plaintiff: John K. Leppert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00173
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Baker et al
as 7:2016cv02797
Plaintiff: Marcia Robinson
Defendant: Trevor Baker, Orra Wood, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Grant v. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals et al
as 1:2016cv02765
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Grant
Defendant: The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals , The City Of New York , , The New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellee: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1385
Plaintiff - Appellee: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellant: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00787
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?