Cases 41 - 50 of 145
Pedraza-Melendez v. Ethicon Johnson & Johnson
as 3:2021cv01249
Defendant:
Ethicon Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon LLC. d/b/a Johnson & Johnson also known as Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC
Plaintiff:
Luis pedraza Pedraza-Melendez and Luis A. Pedraza-Melendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2021op45059
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Swint v. Lord Baltimore Company et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Defendant:
John Edwards, Papa Johns Pizza, Lord Baltimore Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Swint and Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00336
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Frost v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv03498
Defendant:
NYC MTA, City of New York (HRA), F.D.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Pfizer
as 20-617
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories, Inc., Panadol, Nurofen and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Frost v. Regeneson et al
as 1:2020cv10312
Defendant:
Court of Appeals, Roche, US (F.D.A.) and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
