Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez et al v. Jesus Mesa, Jr., et al
as 3:2011cv00331
Defendant:
Ramiro Cordero, Scott A Luck, Victor M Manjarrez, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Guadalupe Guereca Bentacour and Jesus C. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Luck v. Tushka, City of
as 6:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Luck, Jr.
Defendant:
Tushka, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Cuccinelli et al
as 2:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Ken Cuccinelli, Commonwealth of Virginia, Norfolk State University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coan v. Nance et al
as 1:2010cv03914
Plaintiff:
Matt Coan
Defendant:
Tracy Nance, Julie Lardino, A Day With, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Best v. Malec et al
as 1:2009cv07749
Plaintiff:
Eran Best and Eran Best
Defendant:
Stacy Malec, Stacy Malec, Stacy Malec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Milos Leubner v. County of San Joaquin, et al
as 09-16441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILOS LEUBNER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, SAN JOAQUIN OFFICE OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, KENNETH EGGIE and others
Michael McKinzy, Sr. v. MO Division of Child Support, et al
as 09-1900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael E. McKinzy, Sr. and Michael E. McKinzy, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement, Aaron M. Seamonds, Child Support Investigator, State of Missouri and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
