Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Gray v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv02624
Plaintiff:
Adam Gray
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Nicholas Crescenzo, Jr, George Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shoe et al
as 1:2017cv03038
Plaintiff:
Wesley R. Brown
Defendant:
Becky Shoe and Harlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEIL et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2017cv02602
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MCNEIL, MICHAEL B. ELLIS, HAROLD R. STANLEY and others
Defendant:
JANICE R. BROWN, DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG, ROBERT L. WILKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
English v. Searcy Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2017cv00776
Plaintiff:
Ryan A English
Defendant:
Searcy Arkansas, City of, Chris R Brown, Kevin E Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dekom v. Seybert
as 17-3530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Dekom
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Joanna Seybert, Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of The Court for the Eastern District of New York, Dwayne Cox and others
Doyle v. Broward County Sheriff et al
as 0:2017cv62050
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff, Broward County Clerk of Courts, Winston R. Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-12749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roxanne Adams v. Debra Ferguson
as 17-1484
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROXANNE ADAMS, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
DEBRA K. FERGUSON, Licensed Clinical Psychologist
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., NSEKENENE KOLONGO, MD, RENEE EDWARDS, LCSW and others
Brown v. Lever et al
as 2:2017cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roger R Brown
Defendant:
J Lever, Reno Police Dept. and Tallman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv23582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
