Cases 41 - 50 of 17,225
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Ayodale et al
as 1:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Mercy Ayodale, Monica Carew and Uyi Igbinoson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lucius et al v Naphcare Inc.
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Smith v. Harvey et al
as 1:2024cv03611
Plaintiff:
Marque Smith
Defendant:
City of Harvey, G. Thomas, L. Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Semper v. Gadsden Land Bank Association et al
as 4:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Jehan Semper
Defendant:
Gadsden Land Bank Association, Chamberlain Parker, Rod Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Johnson v. Brian Smith, et al
as 24-5436
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH, Individually, JOSH STALLONS, Individually and EDWARD EASTMAN, Individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
