Cases 41 - 50 of 131
Topliff et al v. Ticor Title Company of Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00367
Defendant:
Provident Funding Associates, L.P. and Ticor Title Company of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Larry Topliff and Rachelle Topliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Tapia v. Romance, et al.
as 1:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Joseph S. Romance, R&M Kent Management, Inc, Margaret Kent and others
Plaintiff:
Joline Tapia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv20104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Watson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2018cv03003
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Bank, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, State of Nebraska and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petrou et al v. The Bank of Ann Arbor et al
as 2:2017cv14201
Plaintiff:
Myria Petrou and Bradley Foerster
Defendant:
The Bank of Ann Arbor , Mary Hays , Carl Ent and others
Momo Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Banco Popular North America, et al
as 17-3223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOMO ENTERPRISES, LLC, a dissolved limited liability company, ANASTACIO GONZALEZ and PLAZA LOUNGE, LLC, a dissolved limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, now known as POPULAR COMMUNITY BANK, PEAK PROPERTIES, DAVID AXELROD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Calvin v. Lyons, et al
as 5:2017cv00610
Plaintiff:
Vanessa G Lyons Calvin
Defendant:
Shirley Ann Lyons, John W Doolin, Vickie Leyja and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
