Cases 41 - 50 of 10,552
Barfell v. Driveline Retail Merchandising et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Thomas H.L. Barfell
Defendant:
Driveline Retail Merchandising, Trion Solutions Inc., Heather Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boehmer v. Park et al
as 1:2024cv03855
Plaintiff:
Michael Boehmer
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park, Officer Santillan, Officer Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Song v. Interpol for Netherlands et al
as 1:2024cv03797
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Song
Defendant:
Interpol for Netherlands and Jan Last Name Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Patterson v. Orange County et al
as 7:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
Franeisha Patterson
Defendant:
Orange County, ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutan v. Cast et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Jon Paul Rutan
Defendant:
Marney Cast, Abe Dane, Brent Leininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Dahlstrom v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, United States of America, Merrick B Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Raju AT Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
