Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Ross v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv00845
Defendant:
US Marshalls, Department of Justice & Ohio DOJ, Ross County, OH and others
Plaintiff:
Randy G. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Hoye et al
as 2:2019cv00364
Plaintiff:
Eric Christian
Defendant:
US Marshall Service and Christopher Hoye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leyva v. US Marshal et al
as 3:2019cv00257
Defendant:
ICE HSI and US Marshal
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Banda Leyva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Solomon v. US Marshals
as 5:2018cv00562
Defendant:
US Marshals
Plaintiff:
Patrick Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campos v. BMW Miami et al
as 1:2018cv08065
Defendant:
TD Bank, Lexis Nexus, US Marshals and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Campos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brett v. Blume et al
as 3:2018cv01860
Defendant:
Mr. Schneider, Bill Baronse, Robert Rockwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Amtrak Station Employee Milwaukee et al
as 2:2018cv00855
Plaintiff:
Tracy Webb
Defendant:
Amtrak Station Employee Milwaukee, Police Station Milwaukee, US Marshal Court Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Brett v. Corey Hines, et al
as 17-3580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
COREY HINES, Federal Court Clerk and US MARSHALL BOSS ANTHONY J UNKNOWN
Abubakar Ahmed v. Arizona State University, et al
as 17-17333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABUBAKAR HUSSEIN AHMED
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, through its Campus Police Department, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JOHN CHIPOLSKY, agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Brett v. Cruikshank et al
as 1:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Robert Cruikshank, US Marshall, Bill Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
