Cases 41 - 50 of 561
WAGNER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. WAGNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WAGNER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. WAGNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Rahman v. United States Government
as 23-773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shahidah Rahman
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Government, MV Transportation, DMV Driver 981-740-482, Transcore Para Transit, Driver and others
Scott v. United States Government
as 2:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Gene Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Amar Gueye v. Android, et al
as 23-11324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMAR GUEYE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDROID, T-MOBILE USA, INC., AT&T and others
Scott v. United States Government et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. United States Government et al
as 3:2023cv05333
Plaintiff:
Ruth Marie Anderson
Defendant:
United States Government, Xfinity, Broadband Cable Netwoeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chisum v. United States Government et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ramey Alaine Chisum
Defendant:
United States Government, Social Security Administration, Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Zloza v. FBI et al
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Defendant:
FBI, Chantix, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tran v. United States Government
as 3:2023cv05281
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
